View Single Post
Old 24-09-2005, 23:22   #19
nffc
cf.mega poster
 
nffc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,435
nffc has a nice shiny star
nffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny star
Re: Wireless Cable/DSL Router Safe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMHarman
Quote:
Originally Posted by nffc
Yes but there will still be other O-H bonds in babies!

And it's the same frequency so will have the same energy, and target the same bonds.

Same frequency - yes
Same power - no
microwave up to 900 W
typical hand held-cell phone has a RF power output of 0.600 Watts (600 mW) or almost 20X more output power!
wireless access point has a RF power output of 0.030 Watts
Yes but power is a function of energy- it will have the right energy but just not rotate as many bonds.

The notion that it's harmless because MWs target O-H bonds, and Wifi is the same frequency and is safer, is misguided.

yes it IS safer because it is lower power, but if you're exposed to the same amound it is just as harmful. Whether that's a short blast from a MW or long term from Wifi... kids are more fragile anyway, their cells are dividing more rapidly.
__________________


nffc is offline   Reply With Quote