Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stuart C
I'd be a bit wary of that program. It's (apparently) often used by Hackers.
|
Hackers use IRC and telnet and many other things, yet no-one worries about those things, what bearing on the usefulness or legitimacy of the software does that have?
Lots of technologies are open to misuse, to be honest I'd take it as a compliment in some situations if a hacker chose to use my software, it could just mean that they think it's good at what it does.
*Obviously, if there is legitimate evidence to suggest the software is open to attack I'm interested to know what it is, after all it is currently Corporate standard on my recommendation installed on over 15,000 PC's worldwide.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jon M
Because it would only work if the server/host was running XP or 2003 Server.
You can install the remote client software on virtually any version of windows, but the host has to be one of those two.
|
Quote:
|
Err, we use Terminal Servces on Windows 2000 Server at work. It is built in. Admittedly, it needs to be enabled via the console, but after that it works.
|
lol, if you actually read all the posts you'd see that I was talking about "Remote Desktop" in reference to the first post .. I mentioned Terminal Services a few posts later too
