Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cr80123
Ok Iâ₠¬ÃƒÆ’¢â€žÂ¢m convinced! If someone lets you have something for a fixed period and then wants it back theyââ‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢re not hiring (or lending!) it to you, we havenââ‚ƚ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t seen a document posted with ntl admitting they canââ‚Âà ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t enforce unsigned contracts,
|
Now the document has been removed, but I think it said they 'had difficulty' enforcing the contract. Possibly due to people like yourself who are always looking for loopholes and trying to get something for nothing.
What is cheaper for Ntl? Dragging you through the courts to get a minimum payment off for the rest of the year off you or disconnection?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cr80123
you didnâ₠¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t remove that document then, astonishingly, have the nerve to cast doubt on the validity of it,
|
Anything posted on here without proof of where it came from is suspect. If I knocked something up in Word stating that Tony Blair eats children and posted it would you believe that too?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cr80123
ntl didnâ₠¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t back down when my solicitor wrote to them pointing this out, I didnâ₠¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t get out of my contract within the minimum term and am still paying ntl for my tv and telephone service.
|
Again what is cheaper for Ntl?
To be perfectly honest I'm sure they were glad to see the back of you if this is the way you acting in your dealings with them.