View Single Post
Old 16-09-2005, 20:10   #1
Theodoric
Inactive
 
Theodoric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
Theodoric has reached the bronze age
Theodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze ageTheodoric has reached the bronze age
Using a camcorder as a digital camera

Yes, I'll do my homework on the Internet, but I thought I'd start with the CF experts.

I'm probably going to need a new digital camera. Also, I've always fancied having a camcorder. So, the question occurred to me: would a camcorder double up as an acceptable digital camera. Offhand, the specific questions that occur to me are:

1) Price. Is a cheap camcorder still significantly more expensive than a reasonable quality digital camera.

2) Size. Camcorders seem to get smaller and smaller, but how do the smallest now compare in size with a medium sized digital camera.

3) Probably the most important. How does the quality of a camcorder digital image compare with that from a digital camera. I understand that what may seem like good quality whilst you're watching a video will be found to be markedly inferior when you extract a single image. I've noticed this on the odd occasion when I've attempted to extract a single picture from a video clip produced by my digital camera.

The question could also be put in reverse. Would the quality of the video clips produced by a reasonably expensive digital camera be better than those produced from a cheap camcorder? I'm really only after clips of the grandchildren etc, so I don't really need any complicated techniques.
Theodoric is offline   Reply With Quote