View Single Post
Old 19-09-2003, 12:19   #7
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Quote:
Originally posted by towny
But NTL is compelled by law to provide a reasonable level of service. We have to allow for things to go wrong, but if service levels become atrocious, a court can decide that they have failed to provide reasonable service, as defined by trading standards legislation, and take action accordingly.

The absence of a Service Level Agreement in the T&Cs is not carte blanche for NTL to provide thoroughly unacceptable levels of service. I accept when I sign up that I am not guaranteed a certain level of uptime because I know that I still have the backing of the law if things go completely wrong.

I have no particular incident in mind here - just discussing in general terms the laws that all companies must adhere to re service quality, and which they cannot exempt themselves from by imposing terms and conditions of service.
Which is why I said at the end of my post - 'although these are given discretionally in extreme circumstances'.
orangebird is offline   Reply With Quote