View Single Post
Old 24-08-2005, 21:47   #9
quadplay
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Various
Services: 9am, 1pm and 8pm daily
Posts: 2,055
quadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze array
quadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze arrayquadplay has a bronze array
Re: Why is NTL so slow compared to Sky TV?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
Yay more crap channels filling up the spectrum. Jimbo are these going to be replacing old channels or wasting some more bandwidth that could be used for useful purposes?
Can't say, sorry!

Quote:
In my case sadly I'm contracted. To be honest in my experience Sky was a far superior product, major complaint for me the subtitles actually work on Sky.

Quite horrifically overdue to be fair, glad that your presence there is meaning that services are actually being tested before they are released (CR3 bloatware being a prime example of garbage ntl have thrown on custs in the past) hopefully ntl will catch up with Sky soon.

Oh and FIX THE BLOODY SUBTITLES THEY ARE A JOKE

BU2 is much better. A lot of memory and code optimisation has been done, and subtitles are much improved over BMR1.
quadplay is offline   Reply With Quote