Thread: another digi camera (SLR) thread
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2005, 18:30   #33
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: another digi camera (SLR) thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bifta
Edit: never mind idiot boy discovered that small aperture = less light = darker subject.
= exposed aperture = exposed depth of field.
Strange in this digital, soft press button world when you press a button like that on the camera and hear the iris mechanics closing up.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by andygrif
This is turning into the Canon appreciation thread...and about time too
I originally was a big Olympus fan, OM10 > OM1, all sorts of lenses etc, then the house got burgled.
My failing eyesight (well I'm short sighted anyway) meant I wanted something with autofocus to replace it and at the time looked at Minolta, Canon and a good few others and settled on the EOS10, the only regret is I got the 35-135 as my base lens, not the 28-80 as I don't feel I have a sufficiently wide angle lens these days.

I also have a lovely little IXUS from the days when they took APS film and were the size of cigarette packets. Nowdays My SE K750i makes a very good replacement.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote