View Single Post
Old 08-08-2005, 21:27   #16
thelem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portsmouth for Uni, and Bristol
Age: 42
Services: Portsmouth: ntl Family, 2Mbps and Talk Unlimited Bristol: Telewest Supreme, 4Mbps and Talk Unlimite
Posts: 156
thelem is on a distinguished roadthelem is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to thelem Send a message via AIM to thelem Send a message via Yahoo to thelem
Re: Mandatory NTL Phone Service for TV Customers - Discuss

ntl are simply doing what the market will stand. People are allowed to take phone without TV, so the issue only occurs when you want TV only.

People in that situation have 4 main choices
1. Analogue or Freeview - Free, so cable can't compete on price
2. Top-up TV - A lot cheaper, but no where near the choice
3. Sky - Cheapest package about £20 + BT phone line rental
4. Cable - Cheapest package about £20 INCLUDING line rental.

If you look at it like that, its actually quite a good deal.

I can't imagine it costs ntl £10/month to have a phone line connected in your house, therefore it seems to me that some of that price is going towards the cost of the TV. Yes, they could offer say a £5 discount if you don't take the phone line, but then they would also lose phone call income. Why bother, when they already have a successful and competitive package?
thelem is offline   Reply With Quote