View Single Post
Old 08-08-2005, 13:17   #145
Gareth
cf.mega poster
 
Gareth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 50
Posts: 7,101
Gareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny stars
Gareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny starsGareth has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Another speed increase?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaychsea
No, it's saying if you can find a cable/satelite service for less than ntl then fine, but the bundled cost is irrelevant as it can't be unbundled. If the example was a packet of crips and a can of pop for £1 it only becomes an issue if anyone else is selling the can for less because the shop , in this case, isn't selling them seperatley.
No, the issue is that you are forced to buy one item because you actually want another completely different item that the vendor is selling.

Other industries are legally prevented from doing this - you don't have to buy insurance from your mortgage provider, nor rely on printer cartridges from your printer manufacturer, etc... Personally I'd like to see the Fair Trade Commission investigate this. Just because NTL refuse to unbundle them does not make it irrelevant.

However, this is going off topic, so maybe we would be better discussing this in a separate thread.
__________________

Nice analogy, Charlie_Bubble
Gareth is offline