View Single Post
Old 27-07-2005, 14:06   #16
andygrif
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,820
andygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze array
andygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze array
Re: new spam filter options

Quote:
Originally Posted by ian@huth
We are lucky that Maverick started this thread otherwise we would not have known anything about it so soon.
Absolutely right, and I've repped accordingly - thanks Mav.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikthius
I never knew about this option, and it was set as default to delete.

I want all my mail, even spam, as I will let my application deal with spam.

I don't want ntl to decide what to delete, and what not to delete, as it may not delete the correct things.
Agreed. Aside from the fact that one day in and the system is already giving too many false positives (including mails from it's own servers) it is NOT up to ntl to decide on what email I want to receive.

Irrespective of whether I delete spam messages before downloading or reading them, what ntl is doing is the equivalent of my postman throwing the loan and double glazing junk mail in the roadside bin before putting it through my letterbox.

One day I might just need some double glazing (and the loan to pay for it) - and besides it would be illegal for postie to do that.

So why do ntl think it's OK for them to do exactly the same? Does this breach some sort of rule/contract? I'm in the mood for a fight
andygrif is offline   Reply With Quote