View Single Post
Old 20-07-2005, 23:14   #35
marky
Inactive
 
marky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bolton
Age: 56
Services: non wife took control
Posts: 5,425
marky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny star
marky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny starmarky has a nice shiny star
Re: Request for comments on image quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by iron25
I'm no expert but ...I don't think there is anything you can do about the backgrounds because that's how the camera has 'seen' them when the picture was taken and that's exactly how they would appear on film. Again, I see nothing wrong them and that's what I would have expected had I taken the picture. I'm sure there are some digital cameras which would be able to separate the foreground & background areas so that they could both be in focus but a normal 35mm camera won't do this. I think you were expecting too much

I can't believe this forum hasn't got some camera geek lurking about to give us an 'expert' view
i am such geek and he wanted the background blurred its the quality of the pic which is in question with 35mm film
it should be a whole lot better with such a good camera

oops geek not expert but i dont collect stamps or go train spotting
but the anorack gets a bit sweaty
is that a blue spotted swifwobble flying past
marky is offline   Reply With Quote