Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raistlin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by homealone
it looks like they scanned the negatives, then did a 'resize & resample' to get a standard print size, do they use Irfanview, lol 
the pygmy goat & the meercat came out well, it is the backgrounds that have 'issues' for me at 1280*768 - hth ; Gaz |
Infranview? Looks like they used Windows 98 and Microsoft Paint
It's the backgrounds I have problems with as well.....Is it possible that the blurriness of the background has given the scanner a nightmare and it's just done the best that it can to cope with them?
If that's the case then they have made the prints from the scans that they took because all of the prints show the same effect. |
yup, it looks like your 'depth of field' background defeated the alogarithm tesco use for their resize - take it back & get it done again, or a refund - in my opinion
