View Single Post
Old 20-07-2005, 18:22   #26
Raistlin
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Services: Depends on the person and the price they're offering
Posts: 12,384
Raistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered stars
Raistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered stars
Re: Request for comments on image quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by tabatha
Raistlin...How did you get the pics onto the forum??
Did you scan the negs..pics..or take from the cd??
I took the pic from the CD as provided by Tesco and then uploaded then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tabatha
The images on screen are 26"x24" at a res of 26 ppi.
I took the "goat" down to 6"x4" which gives a res of 318 ppi.
I havent tried to print but on screen there is nothing wrong with them
IMO..I assume you used a 35mm cam,which with a 400 iso film would
possibly show some grain....
Which is what Angua said, I think I might need to try a lower ISO film next time to see if that improves matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tabatha
What is baffling me is how you got a well focused[note the hairs] subject with a moving background????..
The background isn't moving, I just used a large aperature to get a really narrow depth of field. This leaves the object of the photo in sharp focus but blurs the background.
Raistlin is offline   Reply With Quote