View Single Post
Old 20-07-2005, 17:13   #12
Paul K
Inactive
 
Paul K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Essex innit
Age: 52
Services: Sky HD + 16Mb ADSL BT Telephone
Posts: 15,735
Paul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered stars
Paul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered starsPaul K is seeing silvered stars
Re: Request for comments on image quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Often digital pics are better on computer I have found. Looking closely at your pics for 400 speed film the detail (especially on the hair) is good. The only way to get better quality (either normal or on photo CD) would be to drop down to 100ASA film where the resolution is higher especially in bright daylight conditions. Remember you are able to see these pics (on CD) in a much larger format than normal photos so any faults (you think you are seeing) are magnified.
Hmmm.....

I suppose so, I had thought that the ISO of the film might be a contributing factor but even at 400 they shouldn't be as grainy as they are surely?
It is a possibility, have you looked at the photo closely (magnifier if possible) to see how it looks to the naked eye?
Paul K is offline   Reply With Quote