View Single Post
Old 20-07-2005, 17:03   #6
Raistlin
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Services: Depends on the person and the price they're offering
Posts: 12,384
Raistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered stars
Raistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered starsRaistlin is seeing silvered stars
Re: Request for comments on image quality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon M
There is certainly more pixellation on the background than I'd expect.
They should scan the negatives directly, obviously they have got very poor photo processing or post processing digital conversion.
Pixelation, that's the word I was after.

Just looking at the propertied for the files on CD they would appear to be at 24bpp - does that sound about right?

Would it help if I scanned in one of the prints using my own scanner for comparison? I've just had another look at the prints, they're not great but they seem slightly better.....
Raistlin is offline   Reply With Quote