Thread: Google Earth?
View Single Post
Old 18-07-2005, 22:10   #127
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Google Earth?

I think the problem is that it is relatively expensive to get a satellite to fly over somewhere and take a picture. This is probably why Google seems to concentrate on the more heavily populated areas (more chance people will want photos of big cities, so more photos will be taken). They seem to be improving though. I used a version of the software from keyhole technologies a couple of years back and the images (quality and coverage) have improved massively.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote