View Single Post
Old 01-07-2005, 09:45   #10
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: No more free updates for Windows 2000

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrolyte
I'm still using 2000 Pro and I'm going to be sticking with it. No point going to XP if 2000 does the job.
It also runs nicely on machines that would not run XP. I've just upgraded a Celeron 333 with 96Mb of RAM to W2k, works well and far more stable than when on 98.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote