View Single Post
Old 01-07-2005, 01:20   #217
Graham
Inactive
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 60
Posts: 3,170
Graham has a nice shiny star
Graham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny starGraham has a nice shiny star
Re: All F1 2005 Discussions

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackpoolgran
I think the system of no tyre changes is good in the race as it spices things up,
Actually I think the American Indy/ Champ car series has the right idea, you can only have *five* mechanics work on the car in the pit box, instead of the 20+ that F1 generates!

Quote:
an equal distribution of TV revenue would not go ammis, as well as a spending cap on development for each one of the teams
Both of those I would certainly agree with.

Quote:
slick tyres, no cap on engine size!
I'm not so sure about these. The reason for the grooved tyres and restricted engine size regulation is actually (or, at least supposed to be) to slow cars down for sheer safety reasons.

Quote:
no traction controll of launch controll, no exotic materials
I agree with no traction control and reducing all the electronic gizmos, it's supposed to be about the *driver*, not the computers, however the development of "exotic materials" has a "trickle down" effect that benefits society as a whole.

Quote:
er and make paul stoddart president of FIA
Well he can't be a bigger pillock than Max Mosely...!
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote