Thread: Royals cost Britain £37m a year
View Single Post
Old 29-06-2005, 13:29   #96
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Royals cost Britain £37m a year
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Simple democracy is probably the most persuasive.
However our constitutional monarchy IMHO gives a good stabilising influence at the top, though Prez B seems to be riding roughshod over that far more than any other PM in my experience.

I think it is healthy that the person at the top can take long term views without worry of the next election or their limit of 8 years in power and can excercise guidance to that end.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote