View Single Post
Old 28-06-2005, 20:18   #68
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Royals cost Britain £37m a year

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyl
Could I throw that back at you and ask what, apart from a bit of tourist revenue and a portrait to stick on our currency, the good is that the Royals do?

Sell them to the Americans that's what I say
The second paragraph is in part that is what happens anyway. Americans come here and spend money, along with people in hundreds of other countries.

As for your first paragraph, I suspect it is a more than "a bit". I'd stick a fiver on it that it is more than the 61p per person they cost everyone. Don't get me wrong, I really hate the monarchy, but I don't hate the ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£ÃƒÆ ’‚£Ãà¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚£ they bring in. They are known as "The Firm" for a good reason - they make money.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote