Thread: Royals cost Britain £37m a year
View Single Post
Old 28-06-2005, 12:43   #62
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Royals cost Britain £37m a year
Quote:
Originally Posted by purenuman
The reason they are a 'stronghold' is that people vote for them.

If you don't like it you can vote for somebody else, campaign for somebody else or even stand yourself.........
__________________

Yes we can.............in another thread
But the latest rejig of MP boundaries has convinently benefitted Labour more than any other party.

And re the , being as this topic was on the subject of the waste of money the monarchy are (to take an extreme version of the title), it is only fair to interject that there are other far more extreem wastes of money in this country. The Labour government being one of them.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote