View Single Post
Old 20-06-2005, 19:51   #163
iadom
Off sulking.
 
iadom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,041
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
Re: All F1 2005 Discussions

If Bridgestone manufactured a tyre specifically for this race you have to ask yourself why, was it on performance grounds or safety, or a combination of both. If it was in even the slightest way for safety considerations, then they have a moral duty to inform the others of this. I would suspect that had a fatal accident occured and it was later revealed that Bridgestone witheld information that could have prevented it, they would be in deep trouble.
If Bridgestone knew of safety concerns, then Ferrari also knew, if Ferrari knew then it is a cast iron certainty that M Schumacher knew. It is rather ironic that the one driver to have major, life threatening crash was none other the Ralf Schumacher.
I'm am sure that if my little brother was about to go round a track at 200mph with suspect tyres I would have told him.
iadom is offline   Reply With Quote