Quote:
|
Originally Posted by homealone
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
I did actually watch the first game. The level of skill was poor, the level of general play was poor, etc etc.
If that's the pinnacle I hate to think what the leagues are like.
I was being open-minded, but tbh, it's not a patch on the mens game.
As you were...
|
then again, I would rather watch a game played badly, by Women, with honesty & passion, than one by Men, where they let their cynicism overcome their skill - I'm bored with the cheating in football & don't watch much, now.... |
I'm not a fan of the cheating etc either (except of course when I'm in the area with the ball
) but even so- despite it being the pinnacle of the game the quality's still worse than Forest. In the professional men's game, even in the conference these teams would get mullered.
The whole shebang merely serves to endorse my (sexist?) view that football is like yorkie (ie not for girls). fair enough, if you don't think so, but that's what I think and I'm trying to be as constructive as poss
As for it taking airtime off Murray's win... well, thank **** for freeview and streaming net videos!