Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris T
The problem with that is, it assumes that the boy had no prior record of disobeying rules. How do you know he wasn't on a final warning of some kind? The article doesn't say one way or the other.
|
No, so what's the point in making assumptions? The fact is, a teacher would not let a boy sit an exam unless he changed his shoes. So what if he had been warned before? There are ways of dealing with this, and jeopardising a childs education IS NOT the way to do it.
