Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Diamond
I take it I'm the only one who disagrees with the school's decision then?
What harm could wearing the shoes possibly have done during the exam? What good could enforcing this rule have done? What a waste of time and money - educating the student throughout the two year course and paying for the exam entry (about £40 I believe), only to not allow him to take the exam? Quite pathetic really. Even if it's just for the sake of not wasting the school's time and money they should have let him take the exam.
*Hides*
|
So what if you decided it was OK to drive at 70 in a 40 zone because you thought it was a "silly rule" and killed someone- regardless of the rule, its background or its consequences, it's still a rule, and it still needs to be abided by.
No-one has the RIGHT to take an exam especially if they deliberately break pre-informed rules.