Quote:
Originally posted by timewarrior2001
<snip> ...Anmd if S.W had illegally uncapped his CM you are damned lucky NTL didnt prosecute you for Fraud, but hey thats OK isnt it, because you defrauded NTL..... <snip>
|
OK, here are the
FACTS I uncapped, got caught and offered to not only explain to ntl techs how it was done, but also offer a solution to stop anyone ever using that method again.
Instead of taking my offer they quoted irelevant sections of the AUP.... To cut a damn long story short, I had my service suspended (which I paid for) and had to sign a document, which I did.
ntl would
not have prosecuted me for fraud because they could not
prove any of the needed criteria. I uncapped, but they didn't (and don't to this day) know
how.
Now, obviously I shouldn't have done it. I have tried to explain to people that I actualy downloaded
LESS during my 'uncapped' time than I did under normal service, but as usual most people wouldn't listen and just gave me digs for uncapping.
ntl saw fit to suspend my services as a result of my uncapping.
In much the same way that I see it fit for ntl to re-imburse me for loss of service.
Now, advertising which condones piracy / copyright theft is a wrong thing to do. Wether it is more wrong or less wrong than uncapping a CM I'm realy not sure, but either way it is wrong.
Wrong, wrong... wrong.
I am sick of ntl's "ignore the customer at all costs" attitude and am pleased there are others with the same opinion as me.
I say feck 'em. ntl have messed up
AGAIN.