Quote:
Originally posted by MovedGoalPosts
This is not about trying to get ntl taken to court. If that happens only the vultures (lawyers) win.
This is about getting ntl to advertise their services in a fair manner so that potential new (and existing) customers are not mislead. It's about getting ntl to be consistent in the messages they send to their customers.
To attempt to promote the ability and availability of a service that would be illegal to use is just unbelievable. To indicate on one hand that this volume of data transfer is available, when on the other hand the company is desperately trying to limit download use, is frankly appalling.
Departments and management at ntl clearly do not communicate. The regulators seem disinterested or powerless in getting ntl to play fair. At some stage or other ntl have to be made to behave properly. Regrettably, it may take the threat's of legal action to make ntl follow the rules of good business.
|
Sorry but I distinctly read somewhere that FACT had been contacted. Therefor it is about getting NTL prosecuted.
I am not going to comment on the article as I have no legal experience and I do not know anything of copyright law.
What I do know is that some people have jumped in here and done some very strange things. It appears because of personal vendettas against NTL its ok to make others suffer.
Think about this:-
If NTL get shafted in court and it costs them Millions, how the hell are they gonna upgrade and improve the service?