Thread: Powerball
View Single Post
Old 27-05-2005, 12:34   #139
Jon M
Inactive
 
Jon M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: East Midlands
Age: 48
Services: Rural BB - Radio Link via Virgin Fibre
Posts: 2,947
Jon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze array
Jon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze arrayJon M has a bronze array
Send a message via MSN to Jon M
Re: Powerball

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary_580
true, brings up the point about consistency being applied to threads again.

should have been merged ages ago
Looks like neither you, or Graham bothered to read the highscore thread, where I specifically wanted the highscores to remain uncluttered by random posts.
Secondly, it has already had the watchful eye of Chris T over it, surely any issue with merging would have been highlighted by him when he looked at it. I take his in-action in that sense as a sign of approval to be honest.

In general, I think this thread is an exception to the rule, as personally I'm very much in favour of keeping thread numbers to a minimum.

However, I have seen many instances on other forums where an information thread and a discussion thread are kept seperate, which can work very effectively.
I don't think we need to address policy, and as normal members, it's not our job to do so, unless mods specifically ask for our input.

It's been done to death elsewhere, why waste time and effort stirring it up again when it's not going to change anything.
Jon M is offline   Reply With Quote