Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Ignition is there any news on the rwin increase been rolled out? It was done for one area and then we got told it would be rolled out, this was about a month ago.
|
All NetApps run the same config, apart from IP address and name.
Just to upset certain people I have checked and WCCP shows no signs of issues at all in Manchester, as in I can see it doing its' job, requests going in, getting redirected, data being served back to clients.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by badboybubby
Listen my friend, for 37.99 a month I reserve the right to call anything I want 'rubbish', I am not happy with having a proxy server in the first place, never mind having to switch it over every couple of weeks because it falls down.
bbb
|
To say that one user having issues means the entire lot is broken is absurd, we'd see WAY more complaints both on here and officially if most of Manchester's browsing went pop.
As a resolution to the OPs fault may I politely suggest stop specifying caches and leave it transparent. There's actually redundancy in the number of caches there right now which means one can go pop and the others are capable of handling the load. If you insist on specifying your own caches, then complaining when you actually have to use the caches assigned to your local area it's your problem not mine. The caching is transparent for a reason, let it do its' job!
If the caches were that bad in your area where are all the complaints?! There are 14 of them so must be a hell of a lot of customers being served by them (2nd behind Nottingham's 15). Where are the complaints?! As Manchester has in your world been buggered for the past week I'd love to see where the tens of thousands of people with shafted browsing have gone to...