Thread: This Country...
View Single Post
Old 04-05-2005, 20:13   #23
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: This Country...

Quote:
Originally Posted by budwieser
The courts don`t give a **** about us so, if something happens, ie:the above circumstances, I will act and i will take the law into my own hands.
Look at it this way. The judge is quite possibly a homeowner. As are a large percentage of the Jurors (and the rest of the court staff). At the very least everyone in the court lives in a home. If a person is defending his or home against a burglar or intruder, who do you think they will find for? I'll give you a clue. It's the homeowner.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJames
Quote:
Originally Posted by budwieser
Why should people posting an opinion get badly repped for voicing what could possibly be the same as most people think?

.
Some people do not like to be said they are wrong or insist there opinion is final. Sadly they forget this is a forum of debate and go OTT agaisnt anyone slamming there point into every poster and if they wont buckle they redrep.

I don't want to start a debate on repping (we've had enough of those), but people ARE entitled to disagree, and red-repping is one way of expressing that.
Quote:
<snip>
Now we have computer games which promote this ( grand theft auto i went to buy san andreas and kids was there with mommy buying it ) Games like this and tv programs of kids being rude as mentioned before in this thread, comply together to create a negative mentality to these kids, something has to be done as this generation of kids soon will be the one who have to find a job and cope and pull there weight for this country.
Perhaps you could do your bit and report the shop that was selling San Andreas to a minor to your local trading standards authority? While certification is NOT a legal requirement on games as it is with Videos, if a game has a certificate, it IS legally binding, IE 18 rated games are considered the same as 18 rated videos and it is therefore an offence for a shop to sell one to a kid. Unless Mummy was buying it for her kids, in which case, Mummy should take notice of the rating and refuse to buy it.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ D
Quote:
Originally Posted by budwieser
I`m staying out of this one as i got some red reps for my last comments on a similar thread to this !!!!!!.
Me too - I was red-repped for my comment in post 3
Russ, look at this way. The way you phrased your post could have been taken as an insult (and obviosly was by someone). How would you have felt if I had made a sarcastic sounding comment about religious people in a religious thread? How would you have felt if I had assumed you would feel a certain way about something? You have argued with people (and possibly red repped although I wouldn't know that) for less. You've also been known to threaten bannings.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote