Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Roy MM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
Transfer expenses:
2004-5 20m (one player!)
2003-4 52.7m
2002-3 31.5m (2 players)
2001-2 22m (3 players)
1999-2000 10m
1998-99 4.4m
1997-98 15.75m (2 players)
1996-97 3.5m (1 player)
|
A time span of a number of years not two seasons. |
Talk about being selective, that was my point.
Chelsea have spent in two seasons what Utd have spent in several. But, they've still built a side capable of winning the title.
All they've done, is built their side faster. In fact, it's a miracle they've gelled this quickly.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Russ D
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
They've also spent wisely unlike the extortionate sums Munich have spent on crap like Taibi, Silvestre etc etc.
|
That's the last time you refer to Manchester United as 'Munich' here, agreed? |
Touch a nerve there?
If you say so...
