View Single Post
Old 29-04-2005, 21:27   #21
nffc
cf.mega poster
 
nffc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 42
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,489
nffc has a nice shiny star
nffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny star
Re: Sending GMAIL via NTL

Ich don't think so... I've filtered some of the more, shall we say, identifiable info...

From - Fri Apr 29 21:26:17 2005
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Received: from server
([other ip])
by sdf; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:37 +0100
Received: from asd ([ip] helo=[127.0.0.1])
by dsf with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1DRc3D-00052f-00
for dgdf; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4272984C.8090207@domain>
Disposition-Notification-To: email
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:25:48 +0100
From: me
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <mail>
Subject: Re: woot
References: <4272980E.9030804@domain>
In-Reply-To: <4272980E.9030804@domain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0517-5, 29/04/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact x@y.com for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean No hint of changing any reply-tos there. I rest my case.
__________________


nffc is online now   Reply With Quote