View Single Post
Old 29-04-2005, 13:53   #37
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Designer babies Lords give thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Why should the legalities for a clone be any different from those for a baby selected to provide a transplant for a sibling?
Or an identical twin for that matter, after all, they're clones too!



Incog, think about this deeply, and take into account the cash strapped NHS, where many couples who are unable to have children naturally only get one or two chances with IVF because it is so expensive.
Do you really think that they don't make sure that the parents want the second child anyway?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote