View Single Post
Old 28-04-2005, 20:01   #13
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Designer babies Lords give thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ D
I object to life being used in this way. Regardless of what you say now, this is the first step on the way to actual 'designer' babies.
So you'd object to me giving blood or bone marrow or some other genetic tissue to save my sister then?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Wasn't what I said.I was concerned for the child that is born to save an older sibling and how they may feel when old enough to understand the implications.
Would you have a child for the only purpose of saving your current child?
No, I don't believe you would, you'd have another child because you want another child and you'd hope that child would be able to help your current child.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote