[punky]

I have always said the war was badly handled, the 2nd resolution would have been better, for one reason as you said Andy, it would have helped create a more stable world (although that would be limited, as the UN hardly carries any weight or respect in that area of the world). But that leads us back to the question, is it legal, or justified to go ahead without it. With the second resolution the it would have mean relations between the coalition and the rest of the world wouldn't be so bad, but I stand by what I said, that the second resolution isn't compulsary.