View Single Post
Old 28-04-2005, 00:47   #7
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Iraq legal advice leaked

Even if Saddam had disarmed everything, in a timely manner, I still would have voted to remove him. Tomorrow, if I had to.

Not that my opnion matters, but I still think the original resolutions are still active (no sunset clause, obligations not fulfilled in the appropriate timeframe).. This whole second resolution is not an issue. (its not ever a second resolution, Saddam has had enough of them in the past), but just shows what a complete waste of time the UN are. Whenever something comes up, they just talk about. They don't do anything about, just talk. A free trip to NYC with a nice bit of exes, an 18 year old prozzie, and a bit of shopping on 5th avenue to keep the missus happy - you can't blame them really.

Saying this won't increase my fanmail, but I can't see how anyone would protest to keep Saddam in power. Disagree with the war, by all means, it was badly handled most of the way through, but I just don't want to believe there's people out there who'd like who want to leave Saddam, with his sick f**kups for children in power. If they had their way, it would be Idi Amin all over again, where some of the biggest mass murderers in history get to live a life of luxury in a foreign country with full state protection.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote