View Single Post
Old 27-04-2005, 12:07   #25
purenuman
Inactive
 
purenuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madchester
Age: 59
Services: SKY+ & NTL 2mb
Posts: 512
purenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these parts
Re: Discuss about my current vs my upcoming and previous systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/op/cache.htm

guess we are just going to have to disagree over the values of higher cache on hard drives
Or you can change your mind

Most people on fitting a new drive with a larger cache assume the cache is responsible for any performance increase.

The reality is that the HDs internals are likely to be vastly improved when compared to a similar spec older drive (Design age not HD age). Spin speed, ATA spec and cache size etc have less impact on data read/write speed than

Data Density. Getting a drive with 2 platters vs 5 platters that holds the same amount of data. The higher the density the faster the read/write.

Disc access. The faster the heads can move from the inside track to the outside track, the faster it can access files.

I'm not saying that a larger cache doesn't help......... Just that any big increase in performance that most people get when installing a drive with a bigger cache is usually down to the drive as a whole being better.
purenuman is offline   Reply With Quote