Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
It does nothing of the sort, it is merely the ramblings of a pop star in an interview. I`m sorry, but if that is you idea of credible evidence then I do not feel it worth debating with you any further. When you have something meaningful to present then by all means do present it. Until then, if this is the best "evidence" that you can come up with then I honestly feel that any rebuttal is wasted.
|
Ramblings or not, the intent is there, by a high profile activist. And even this one single interview poses more credible than anything to show the opposite, because the evidence for the opposite currently appears to be non existent.