Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
Of course its irrelevant to you as it doesnt give any credibilty to your opinion, however while Moby may not even be a gay himself, he is a high profile avid supporter of gay activism and gay rights, and you chose to disregard it, which is a form of acceptance of abuse, as that is what that would mount to if it were to happen.
|
It is *entirely* irrelevant as just because he says he wants to do something doesn`t mean he can. It is irrelevant to *both* our arguments as it is merely drivel from some puffed up celebrity. When you have an article that warrants serious attention, come back. Until then, don`t waste my time with this trivia.
Quote:
|
And you cannot seem to accept that all four were listed in my post, I seperated the first as it had all ready recieved some debate, and again I put it that it was a deliberatly chosen single lateral context in the first instance becasue it suited their point of veiw. The other 3 were added to balance that argument.
|
No, you did not. You made a passing reference to their being differences of opinion, outside of the main thrust of the argument in your post, therefore clearly marking it as something separate.
Quote:
|
You continuation of insisting you did the balancing is as false as the accusation you make of me below, which is paramount to derogatory insults, but not to my intelligence, as it clearly shows you for what you are
|
Ok, let's have a laugh and assume you are right. Surely that means that you are a hypocrite for failing to address my question. Again, I ask you, do you advocate child endangerment as a valid option in the face of your prejudices?
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Salu
There are some things that you should do/say something about. They are morals. Morals should not just be demoted to opinions. What about seeing someone being beaten up on the street? Would you intervene when you saw someone being raped? etc etc. You obviously feel passionate enough to argue against how I feel because you *feel* that I am *wrong*. Mind you I think you would argue the toss over anything as you enjoy a good rant....  |
Morals are *nothing* but opinions. There is no absolute right and wrong in the universe, just what is perceived as acceptable at any given point in time. Given that acceptability itself is not based on any objective measures to a very large degree.
With regard to your question, if I saw someone being raped then I would intervene, but it is still only an opinion that a woman shouldn`t be treated in this fashion, not an objective, universal truth.