Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
If this is the best evidence that you can come up with then I suggest you try again. Just because some singer makes a statement about his intentions. I could claim in News 24 that I intend to walk across the ceiling un-aided, doesn`t mean that it is going to happen. 
__________________ |
Of course its irrelevant to you as it doesnt give any credibilty to your opinion, however while Moby may not even be a gay himself, he is a high profile avid supporter of gay activism and gay rights, and you chose to disregard it, which is a form of acceptance of abuse, as that is what that would mount to if it were to happen.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Selectively balance? I don`t think so. There were four possible combinations, you only listed three. By stating the fourth I am balancing things, but hardly selectively.
|
And you cannot seem to accept that all four were listed in my post, I seperated the first as it had all ready recieved some debate, and again I put it that it was a deliberatly chosen single lateral context in the first instance becasue it suited their point of veiw. The other 3 were added to balance that argument.
You continuation of insisting you did the balancing is as false as the accusation you make of me below, which is paramount to derogatory insults, but not to my intelligence, as it clearly shows you for what you are
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
Ok, if you are going to persist on this one I`ll accept that you think your debating technique is valid. That forces to me to conclude that you do think it a good think to put children in the way of physical harm.
|