Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
I have read your posts, but what matters there is what you have put in that post. I`m sorry if you expect everyone to automatically cross-reference everything you have written in this thread, or was that an after-thought defence? In the context of that particular post you failed to mention the volatile-hetero combination. I did acknowledge your frankly bizarre, child threatening predilection to that combination over a loving-homosexual couple when I question your debating technique vs your apparent like of child endangerment. So, as you can see, people have been reading what you post, that's partly why it is so glaringly absent when you leave it out of a subsequent argument.
|
The real question is why was a singular lateral context used in the first place by someone else ?
And why do you selectively pick my balancing of that ?
I guess both answers dont just speak for themselves they are also one and the same
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=43960
:o