View Single Post
Old 25-04-2005, 21:57   #15
purenuman
Inactive
 
purenuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madchester
Age: 59
Services: SKY+ & NTL 2mb
Posts: 512
purenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these partspurenuman is just so famous around these parts
Re: Discuss about my current vs my upcoming and previous systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
Its the cache makes the difference 2 mb running an o/s on, in my experience will make quite a difference in general performance
The cache doesn't help unless you ask for the same data again.

When a hard drive is accessed, the data is copied from the drive to the cache and then delivered to the calling process.
This is done so that the next time that data needs to be accessed it can be taken straight from the cache, reducing the access time because the platters themselves will not need to be accessed.
It only speeds things up if you are calling the same data over and over....
purenuman is offline   Reply With Quote