Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
Someone else who cant read, check the first sentence of that post which clearly states weve allready covered in the thread what you accuse me of cunningly omitting. Now go read the thread, as I suggest if you want to debate in a concise way you get a clear view of what is being said, not just the bits you want to read
|
I have read your posts, but what matters there is what you have put in that post. I`m sorry if you expect everyone to automatically cross-reference everything you have written in this thread, or was that an after-thought defence? In the context of that particular post you failed to mention the volatile-hetero combination. I did acknowledge your frankly bizarre, child threatening predilection to that combination over a loving-homosexual couple when I question your debating technique vs your apparent like of child endangerment. So, as you can see, people have been reading what you post, that's partly why it is so glaringly absent when you leave it out of a subsequent argument.
For reference, the first statement of your post was:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
Theres a differing of opinions wether a volitile hetro parent set is better than a loving gay parent set
|
No mention of things being covered in previous posts. Or am I mistaken, are you using the word "first" in some entirely novel manner?