Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
How about which is better between a loving hetro set of parents and a gay loving parent set or a loving hetro parent set and a volotile gay couple ?
|
That's like asking which is better, Ghandi with a machine gun or Hitler with a kitten?
BTW, you may want to check your maths. You've got two different factors here, sexuality and volatility, you've cunningly left out the volatile hetero couple in your example. Well, not that cunning really when it is so pathetically transparent the lengths you need to go to when trying to win your argument.
Or are we to honestly believe that you prefer a volatile hetero couple over a loving gay couple? Are you honestly saying that you would prefer a child be raised in a home with domestic violence over one without? I know you've stated that earlier as "fact", I just want to confirm that is what you believe.
So which is it, dubious debating technique or a genuine preference to put children in the path of physical danger?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NitroNutter
Either parents do have influence by the lifestyles lived and the way they rear their children or they dont.
|
Or they can influence the factors that are primarily nuture, while not really influencing the factors that are primarily nature.
