Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
That's a somewhat narrow argument, given that you latched on to one particular definition of "natural" that happens to fit your argument. If we use it in the sense of something that happens in nature, then it is entirely natural it is well documented that homosexual activity does take place in nature.
If we are to use "natural" in the sense of belonging to the majority, does that mean we can legitimately treat anyone who does not conform to the model of "Mr. Average" as a second class citizen? Do you not have any attributes that set you apart from the crowd? Would you be happy if you were treated as a second-class citizen as a result?
|
Use "normal" or commonplace then rather than natural then. I'm talking about the numerical dominance in society of majorative behaviour.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
If historical precedent is so important to you, I guess you have no problems with buggering young boys?
|
EH??!!
Bizarre comparison....
I dread to think what made you think of that....
Needless to say I do not agree with your statement.