View Single Post
Old 22-04-2005, 14:01   #16
th'engineer
Inactive
 
th'engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Middleton North West Manchester
Services: up to 30 MEG CF version of Peter Kay
Posts: 1,871
th'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to allth'engineer is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to th'engineer
Re: Are you getting a better service since the upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
I can't really see how an 'about the same' could come into it. It's supposed to be a service improvement. If speed upgrade worked your service is better, if issues arose from the upgrade then service has been degraded assuming it was working properly as before.

IMHO a 1.5Mbit fully working service is better than a 3.0Mbit dubious service, I'd regard any instability in connection resulting from the upgrade as degradation, which is not offset by the better speeds when connection is working.
there something wrong here why are we agreeing
th'engineer is offline   Reply With Quote