Thread: channels
View Single Post
Old 21-04-2005, 09:21   #8
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matth
Shortly and soon mean different things to NTL than to the rest of us!

Don't much fancy a Sky dish, but maybe it's time to start getting a complete feed, instead of whatever NTL get round to finding the time and capacity for.

Any launches most definitely do not follow as a matter of course.

I suppose one advantage of NTL, is no ugly dish, and no weather related problems with it - basic problem is that NTL are NOT an alternative to Sky, they are just a second-tier carrier of Sky programmes - the only good channel of their own, "The Studio", was killed a long time ago.
Looking out of my window the view is not spoilt by Sky dishes but by Freeview aerials. They are far more obtrusive. Even a standard Sky dish if sited reasonably well is not too obtrusive and goes virtually unseen if alternative dishes including clear and colours are used. Sky, if installed properly, hardly suffers any weather related problems.

New channels nearly always appear on Sky. Just think about ITV3 which many cable fans were laughingly talking about not being available on Sky but how did the reality pan out? Cable unfortunately has to wait a considerable length of time for some channels after they have appeared on Sky.
ian@huth is offline   Reply With Quote