Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mal
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nffc
You've ducked the main issue- and that's the double standards from Ferguson when it's been PROVED he's tapped up in the past [Stam]. When he's on the receiving end he doesn't like it, but it's OK when he does it. Clive Hunt of the highest order, right up there with Neil Warnock and his scheming tricks.
|
It is double standards to slag off chelsea for what he's allegedly done himself. 
Just that Chelsea may have done it in a way which casts doubt over the incident.
I mean that you'd automatically assume that they wouldn't do it in such a public place. But who knows.
For me though, the agent seems to be playing the 2 clubs off each other, saying that Chelsea are after Ferdinand, so utd will increase their deal. |
It could well be agents' talk though. It could be feasible that kenyon and ferdinand were in the same restaurant by coincidence... although that said, what reason did rio have to be in london? surely as you say, they wouldn't be so naive would they?
i personally can't see why chelsea would want him, they have terry [former forest player, well on loan anyway], gallas, huth... and they really should spend money on a full back if anything. in any case, i don't even think ferdinand's as good as his hype, judging by his debut today, it won't be long before a certain spurs player displaces him. what's he ever done, besides a few good games in the world cup? he can't even remember when he's having a drug test
as you say, the way chelsea have done it, if they have even done it, casts doubt over the incident itself. and surely they wouldn't be so foolish as to do it just after getting the rap for ashley cole?
i don't believe it, but then, that's probably because i have slight leanings for chelsea anyway [from when they were crap] and hate man u like nothing else except d*rby county...