View Single Post
Old 12-04-2005, 20:37   #24
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: outbreak.ntli.net

Quote:
Originally Posted by greencreeper
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
It doesn't determine 100% that a particular machine can host the virus - two Windows PCs returning the same string could have one vulnerable, one not, depending on whether patches have been installed. It doesn't have enough information to make a certain judgement.
Exactly - so why write the software in the first place if they know it (a) cannot work because there's no way to identify infected PCs; and (b) users can leave the garden by downloading patches - no installation necessary.
They may not be able to determine which PCs are patched with 100% efficiency, but they can detect machines acting suspiciously (port scanning, bulk emailing etc). I personally think this is a good thing, and, frankly, don't understand why you don't.
5
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote