Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
You can't, but the point is you want to spend at least five *BILLION* pounds on trying to prove it!
And what happens if, after all that (as seems much more likely) it turns out that it doesn't work and would never be able to do half the things that were promised for it, what would you say?
"Oh, sorry, we've wasted enough money to build a load of new hospitals and police stations and employ a whole lot of more doctors, nurses and police, but, hey, it seemed like a good idea at the time!)
If you're trying to use this as an argument in favour of your position, it would have worked better if you'd actually got your facts right! But there again, it seems that facts don't feature much in your arguments anyway.
|
Don't get tetchy Graham, or I shall tell the Administrators! Oh no, that's your trick, isn't it. When someone gets something wrong, try pointing it out? As in fact they would to you, if you were ever to get anything wrong. But you don't, silly me, I forgot.
Back on topic, how do you propose it is tested, and at what cost? And can I please have FACTS and FIGURES, not estimates and possibilities?